Subpoenas against three New York Times journalists withdrawn amid legal criticism

The US government has withdrawn subpoenas demanding testimony from three New York Times reporters about their sources for a story on an Air Force One jet linked to President Trump. This move...

Subpoenas against three New York Times journalists withdrawn amid legal criticism

The US government has withdrawn subpoenas demanding testimony from three New York Times reporters about their sources for a story on an Air Force One jet linked to President Trump. This move follows judicial criticism of the government’s legal approach.

The subpoenas were part of broader efforts to identify leakers related to a story about the president’s use of an older Air Force One jet. Similar attempts to compel testimony from journalists at other major outlets have also been recently abandoned.

Attorneys for the United States government have withdrawn subpoenas seeking to compel three New York Times reporters to testify about their sources for a story about an Air Force One jet gifted to US President Donald Trump by Qatar.

Related coverage: New wave of US tariffs targets more than 80 countries under forced labor rules.

Judge Arun Subramanian slammed the government’s lawyers for what he deemed sloppy legal work in an exchange in court on Thursday.

“Subpoenas are not the first thing you do; they are the last thing you do,” an irritated Subramanian said.

More context: Iraqi PM Ali al-Zaidi’s First Official Visit to Iran Focuses on Deepening Bilateral Ties.

“When you see something like this, if this were a civil proceeding, what I would normally do is ask the parties to show causes why sanctions should not be issued,” he added.

Also read: Man receives life sentence for fatal attack on Minnesota Democratic lawmaker and family.

Background: Over 100 UK Millionaires Call on PM Andy Burnham to Raise Taxes on Ultra-Wealthy.

The Trump administration had sought to keep the proceedings secret as it pressured the reporters to reveal their sources for a story, a request that raised alarms for US press freedoms as the president and his allies continue to aggressively target critical media and political opponents.

Such efforts, however, have largely been rejected in court. The US government recently withdrew similar subpoenas that sought to compel testimony from reporters with the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal.

Lawyers for the New York Times challenged the legitimacy of the grand jury subpoenas along with subpoenas for the phone records of several journalists and their relatives. The paper’s managing editor and general counsel sat in the gallery during proceedings on Thursday.

The government has said that it is pursuing those who have leaked material to reporters for a story about Trump taking an older model Air Force One jet back from a summit in Turkiye, rather than the one gifted from Qatar.

Advertisement

The Secret Service reportedly advised that the new jet, which the government has spent $400m to retrofit and upgrade, lacks important security features such as antimissile capabilities.

“Reporters are not the targets; those leaking classified information are,” the Department of Justice said of the subpoena requests.

Obtaining information from government sources is a cornerstone of journalism, and national security reporting in particular and is considered essential to press freedom. Efforts by the US government under both Democratic and Republican administrations to compel reporters to disclose their sources have been viewed as an effort to weaken those protections.

Related coverage:

Share
Discussion Subpoenas against three New York Times journalists withdrawn amid legal criticism

    No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Related Stories